Mankowski Homes
Solution Options

Two paths. One campus. Real numbers.

The board's primary decision: generate clean energy, or generate, store, and shift to also beat the demand charge.

Annual savings
$30,579
Battery contribution
$6,193
Demand charges avoided
$4,200
Payback
10.4 yrs
Board decision required — battery scope

Approved battery budget is ~4× too small for the recommended system

Approved set-aside
$35,000
Recommended (87.3 kWh / 9 modules, grid-tied)
$119,086.80
Additional approval needed
$84,086.80

A $35K battery is too small to meaningfully shift solar into the 4–9pm SCE peak window. The full 87.3 kWh / 9-module grid-tied system is what generates the demand-charge avoidance and peak-shaving savings shown above.

A day in the life of the campus

How a grid-tied battery + load management beat the demand charge

Hour: 00:00
Utility demandSolar productionBattery dischargeDemand charge avoided
PEAK DEMAND WINDOW08162432kW00:0004:0008:0012:0016:0020:0023:00
Demand
6.2 kW
Solar
0.0 kW
Battery
0.0 kW
idle
From grid
6.2 kW

Demand charges are billed on the single highest 15-minute pull from the grid each month — typically a hot summer evening between 4pm and 9pm, after the sun has dropped. The battery discharges directly into that window and the Load Management System throttles non-critical loads. The pink playhead shows exactly when this matters.

Why batteries (grid-tied, not backup)

Storage exists to shift solar energy into the evening peak. That single shift cuts ~70% of the demand charges that solar alone cannot touch. This is a grid-tied system — it does not provide backup power during a grid outage.

What gets added

87.3 kWh lithium battery (9 modules, grid-tied)
Load Management System (LMS)
Demand-charge avoidance
Peak shaving on the 400A service

Savings breakdown

Solar offset (energy)$24,386
Battery contribution$6,193
Demand charges avoided$4,200

Total annual savings$30,579